Showing posts with label Joe Navarro. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joe Navarro. Show all posts

June 5, 2010

California Loses A Great Teacher

The economic cyclone that started over two years ago continues its devastating path across the country, with public services increasingly in the path or already sucked up into the funnel itself. I just got a letter written by an old compa of mine, revolutionary poet Joe Navarro, explaining why he feels he has to take an early retirement offer from his teaching job in the Hollister, California, public schools.


I hope those who have never met Joe will get a sense from his letter just how serious a loss this is for the students of Hollister. He is a concerned and gifted educator whose ability to teach has been all but destroyed by the crisis-fueled policies being imposed on the system.

Before Joe's letter, here is a little context. And let it serve as a damn wake up call to those in states where the budget crisis is still festering and hasn't erupted into the open running sore that it is in California--the eighth largest economy in the world, state officials used to like to brag.

A three minute Google search turned up an AP article from yesterday on schools in San Jose, whence this ugly excerpt:

The library at Silver Creek High is open for only an hour a day. The career center is closed. There is no more summer school. And student athletes must pay $200 each.

State budget cuts will make things even worse next year. The school will probably have five fewer classroom days and lose three of its four guidance counselors and three of its four custodians, as well as its health aide, mental health coordinator and student activities director. The future of student government, clubs, pep rallies, homecoming and prom is in doubt.


Though there was no mention of it in the alarming article, there are doubtless teachers, good experienced educators, right at Silver Creek High making the same agonized decision that Joe Navarro has.

Dear Friends,

I have come to an important decision. I have accepted an offer to take early retirement from my school district. My conscience is at a crossroad. I can no longer deliver the methods of instruction as prescribed by my school district, the state of California and federal mandates.

Teaching has been my passion and my calling. I started late, at 40 years of age and my starting point was a student and parent advocate.

When I began teaching there were still ideals that included teaching to the whole child, bilingual/bicultural education, content mastery, equality, quality education, developing children into problem solvers and critical thinkers. Since then, the language has been hijacked by politically conservative think tanks and politicians. Now, the quest for quality teaching has been replaced by the quest for best test scores. Scripted lesson plans, rote memorization, English-only education, drill and skill instruction and overzealous test preparation now dominate teaching.

The carefully crafted wording for education reform has tapped into the righteous sentiments of people of color who want education to be equal for all nationalities. Phrases like "tougher," "more rigorous," "higher," "run schools using the business model," etc. have fooled people into believing that the only problem with education has been that we have gotten too soft on kids and cannot compete internationally.

One major problem with these arguments are that rote memorization and drill and skill instruction do not amount to higher quality learning. Another problem is that if you look at high performing schools in affluent communities they teach critical thinking skills and problem solving, while people of color and poor people receive higher doses of rote memorization and drill and skill instruction.

The U.S. produces huge numbers of scientists, engineers and intellectuals in comparison to the rest of the world and cannot be compared to countries that do not have the same multinational characteristics as the U.S. The reason that work for scientists, intellectuals and engineers are being exported to other nations is not because there are not enough of them in the U.S., but that scientists, intellectuals and engineers in the third world work cheaply.

Current standards in the US are high. The problem is that there is a double standard of how education is delivered to schools, from teacher preparation, to policy makers, to administrators and teachers. No one wants to deal with issues like underfunding poor people and people of color; racist policies like zero tolerance; eliminating bilingual/bicultuaral education; or whitening the curriculum. Paolo Freire argued for critical pedagogy where you create an education system that not only teaches children how to read, write and do math, but also to teach them to be analytical, critical thinkers and grow up to improve society.

I have argued this point, written letters to the editor, joined in the letters to Obama, written to my congresspersons, shared my research, argued with my administrators and defied policies by teaching critical thinking skills, art and culture. My hands are tied in the classroom.

I don't know what is next. It's a bitter-sweet reality for me. I am sad and feel relieved at the same time. I am also uneasy now that I don't have a job. What's next? I don't know.

Best Wishes,

--Joe

Read more!

July 3, 2008

A Few Thoughts On Patriotism

bloglines del.icio.us Digg facebook Google Ma.Gnolia Newsvine Technorati socializer StumbleUpon Yahoo


[What with tomorrow being Independence Day, I had considered reprinting abolitiionist leader Frederick Douglass's famous 1852 speech which raised the question "What, to the American slave, is your 4th of July?" When my eye fell on the new issue of the online magazine, the Black Commentator, there it was--and I'd rather encourage everybody to visit that important site and sign up for regular notification of new issues.

By great good fortune, my in-box also contained a thoughtful new piece on the Fourth by Chicano activist and poet, Joe Navarro. Here it is.]

by Joe Navarro

Webster’s Dictionary and Thesaurus defines patriotism as “zealous love of one’s country.” As we approach the Fourth of July, a national holiday, I have been contemplating the idea of patriotism as defined here and instinctively reject the idea of having “zealous love” for this country.

Even as a child I felt that the national symbols and hymns were forced upon me in school and did not really mean anything to me. I learned to mechanically remember the pledge of allegiance, national anthem and the symbols of this country so that I would not get in trouble or ridiculed in my classroom.

As I grew older, phrases like, “liberty and justice for all,” were disconnected from my own experiences in my community. As my comprehension of national and world events expanded, I learned that the words of major doctrines, such as the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, were meant for wealthy white men, but not everyone else.

Patriotism assumes that our society is homogenous, and is void of any recognition of class, racial, ethnic and gender differences. U.S. imperialist aggression in Southeast Asia, Latin America and the Middle East are invigorated by a sense of blind patriotism, where Americans uncritically support whatever the U.S. government wants. Patriotism is a combination of vague ideals and selective amnesia, which is rooted in ignorance. In schools, from the media and press, and official government reports we are fed a distorted history, lies and heavy doses of propaganda.

During the current invasion and occupation of Iraq, people finally started to make the connection between the overwhelming propaganda to justify an unjust invasion on the one hand and U.S. corporate interests to control petroleum, and sack Iraq’s economy by hiring wealthy corporations to rebuild Iraq on the other.

This questioning of the real interests of the Iraq invasion has caused the Bush Administration to restrict democratic rights of U.S. citizens and non-citizens. Eavesdropping on people’s email and phone calls, to increasing suspicion of immigrants, to denying people due-process under the law, based on ethnicity are all threats to democracy in America.

In my lifetime, the U.S. military and CIA have been involved in invading Southeast Asia, Nicaragua, Panama, supported a successful military coup in Chile, an unsuccessful coup in Venezuela (to name a few) and countless other military actions in the world.

Domestically, there is a long tradition of the U.S. military attacking people for the benefit of the wealthy elite. In addition to the enslavement of Africans, genocide against Native Americans, theft of Mexican territories, occupation of the Philippines, Guam, Puerto Rico and other people’s lands; the U.S. government has attacked workers of all nationalities who fought for better working conditions and the right to unionize; has kept women’s status economically and politically below men; has maintained a system of hatred and bigotry against gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgendered persons; and people of color still are treated as second class citizens culturally, politically and economically.

Historically, every step of progress of this nation has benefited the smallest, most elite sector of this society. Oil barons, industrialists, investment bankers, real estate giants, agribusiness, Wall Street traders, corporate CEOs, weapons manufacturers are the silent partners of this nation, who through their wealth and influence, benefit from oppression and wars.

How can one demonstrate “zealous love” for this tradition? As an American citizen, who is also a Native American and Chicano, I prefer to celebrate the heroes who have resisted and opposed oppression domestically and internationally.

Instead, I honor African slaves who rebelled against slavery, and white abolitionists who dedicated their lives to end the barbarism; I celebrate the original people of this land who fought and resisted genocide and the Mexicans who battled against a mighty military force to defend their lands from a brutal annexation; I admire the women who have tireless fought for women’s rights to vote, for reproductive choice and for equality; I honor Chinese, Japanese and other Asian immigrants who have survived and resisted severe racism, ostracism and unlawful incarceration; I celebrate civil rights and human rights activists who marched, protested and fought for equality in education, employment, housing and healthcare, and expanded democracy; I honor people who strive to uncover the truth about this nation and peace activists who protest in the streets to let the world know that imperialist aggression is not supported by everyone.

So, on the Fourth of July, I will not be a blindfolded flag waving patriot. I will honor and celebrate all the people who have fought (and died) to defend people from oppression and who worked to expand democracy in America.

Read more!