data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b48d9/b48d9c6c831e05407d2ff858f80f5f741b8e6c94" alt=""
Wonder if anybody's selling tee shirts yet...
(Apologies to FotM readers from outside the US who don't get it.)
[Note: a fine short introduction to Fanon's theoretical contributions from a Marxist standpoint can be found here.]
UPDATE:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d1b4/6d1b4360faae7fca52952d162d4dcd15e6c52ee7" alt=""
Chalk it up to Frog in the Well Syndrome. Here in Harlem, it seems like you can't go a block without seeing Shepard Fairey's distinctive agitprop-retro creation in a shop window or on a bootleg tee. And if you spend any time rummaging around in the vast sock drawer of the left liberal blogosphere, you'll o.d. on it pretty soon too.
And a one shot joke that needs explanation. How funny is that?
4 comments:
maybe i'm completely dense, but i don't get it.
Hey Isaac,
It's riffing on the popular Obama posters by Obey Giant:
http://obeygiant.com/post/obama
Obey Giant's style has elicited quite a bit of discussion of its blatant appropriation of left-wing imagery, particularly when it is embraced by a bourgeois candidate. People, despite everything, are familiar with the associated radicalism of what those images represent, but that radical "hope" and "change" are not there.
(And of course right-wingers get off on pointing this out when they want to "prove" Obama and Democrats are Communists. Some liberals talk about its "troubling heritage." Admittedly we left-wingers, and liberals too, would be similarly vocal if fascist imagery was used to sell something, particularly a candidate.
Thanks for the clarification, nathaniel! Looks like you commented just as I was posting the update. Having to explain a joke you've (re)told is pretty embarrassing.
In the meantime, here's an interview with Shepard Fairey, highlighting his radical flava, including busts for Robbie Conal-style street sniping (large scale wheatpasting, in this case of political images). Taken at face value, the article seems to hint that Fairey has put himself in a box. Badly wanting Obama to win, he seems to be avoiding the Rev. Wright role of using a bit of Obama-related celebrity to lay out a few home truths about the system to a larger audience.
Incidentally, there is a savage critique of Fairey's work as content-free plagiarism (written before the Obama poster showed up) by Mark Vallen at his "Art for a Change" website. Struck me as a bit one-sided but I'll (uncharacteristically) let ignorance still my keyboard here...
oh, ok, that makes sense. the inconsistency of the "frantz fanon" underneath the portrait confused me - since the original isn't labeled literally, "barack obama," the inconsistency threw me off. like maybe the other one would say "anti-colonialism" or something. anwyay....
i re-read and enjoyed your SDS pamphlet from '87 or so the other day. are the other 2 pamphlets in the series (from frso student commission) still around anywhere? in any case, if there is a printed out version of even that pamphlet i'd like to get a copy (maybe in a month in jersey?)
Post a Comment